This section describes how to set up complete replication of a MySQL server. There are a number of different methods for setting up replication, and the exact method that you use will depend on how you are setting up replication, and whether you already have data within your master database.

There are some generic tasks which may be required for all replication setups:

Once you have configured the basic options, you will need to follow the instructions for your replication setup. A number of alternatives are provided:

If you want to administer a MySQL replication setup, we suggest that you read this entire chapter through and try all statements mentioned in Section 12.6.1, “SQL Statements for Controlling Master Servers”, and Section 12.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”. You should also familiarize yourself with the replication startup options described in Section 18.1.2, “Replication Startup Options and Variables”.

mysql> GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE ON *.*
    -> TO 'repl'@'%.mydomain.com' IDENTIFIED BY 'slavepass';

[mysqld]
log-bin=mysql-bin
server-id=1

[mysqld]
server-id=2

shell> mysql -h master < fulldb.dump

Warning: You should set server-id to a non-0 value if master_host
is set; we will force server id to 2, but this MySQL server will
not act as a slave.

mysql> CHANGE MASTER TO
    ->     MASTER_HOST='master_host_name',
    ->     MASTER_USER='replication_user_name',
    ->     MASTER_PASSWORD='replication_password',
    ->     MASTER_LOG_FILE='recorded_log_file_name',
    ->     MASTER_LOG_POS=recorded_log_position;

This section describes the options that you can use on slave replication servers. You can specify these options either on the command line or in an option file.

On the master and each slave, you must use the server-id option to establish a unique replication ID. For each server, you should pick a unique positive integer in the range from 1 to 2³² – 1, and each ID must be different from every other ID. Example: server-id=3

Options that you can use on the master server for controlling binary logging are described in Section 5.2.3, “The Binary Log”.

The master.info file format in MySQL 5.0 includes values corresponding to the SSL options. In addition, the file format includes as its first line the number of lines in the file. (See Section 18.4.2, “Replication Relay and Status Files”.) If you upgrade an older server (before MySQL 4.1.1) to a newer version, the new server upgrades the master.info file to the new format automatically when it starts. However, if you downgrade a newer server to an older version, you should remove the first line manually before starting the older server for the first time.

If no master.info file exists when the slave server starts, it uses the values for those options that are specified in option files or on the command line. This occurs when you start the server as a replication slave for the very first time, or when you have run RESET SLAVE and then have shut down and restarted the slave.

If the master.info file exists when the slave server starts, the server uses its contents and ignores any options that correspond to the values listed in the file. Thus, if you start the slave server with different values of the startup options that correspond to values in the master.info file, the different values have no effect, because the server continues to use the master.info file. To use different values, you must either restart after removing the master.info file or (preferably) use the CHANGE MASTER TO statement to reset the values while the slave is running.

Suppose that you specify this option in your my.cnf file:

[mysqld]
master-host=some_host

The first time you start the server as a replication slave, it reads and uses that option from the my.cnf file. The server then records the value in the master.info file. The next time you start the server, it reads the master host value from the master.info file only and ignores the value in the option file. If you modify the my.cnf file to specify a different master host of some_other_host, the change still has no effect. You should use CHANGE MASTER TO instead.

MySQL Enterprise For expert advice regarding master startup options subscribe to the MySQL Enterprise Monitor. For more information, see http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/advisors.html.

Because the server gives an existing master.info file precedence over the startup options just described, you might prefer not to use startup options for these values at all, and instead specify them by using the CHANGE MASTER TO statement. See Section 12.6.2.1, “CHANGE MASTER TO Syntax”.

This example shows a more extensive use of startup options to configure a slave server:

[mysqld]
server-id=2
master-host=db-master.mycompany.com
master-port=3306
master-user=pertinax
master-password=freitag
master-connect-retry=60
report-host=db-slave.mycompany.com

The following list describes startup options for controlling replication. Many of these options can be reset while the server is running by using the CHANGE MASTER TO statement. Others, such as the --replicate-* options, can be set only when the slave server starts.

Once replication has been started it should execute without requiring much regular administration. Depending on your replication environment, you will want to check the replication status of each slave either periodically, daily, or even more frequently.

MySQL Enterprise For regular reports regarding the status of your slaves, subscribe to the MySQL Network Monitoring and Advisory Service. For more information, see http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/advisors.html.

mysql> SHOW SLAVE STATUS\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
             Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
                Master_Host: master1
                Master_User: root
                Master_Port: 3306
              Connect_Retry: 60
            Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000004
        Read_Master_Log_Pos: 931
             Relay_Log_File: slave1-relay-bin.000056
              Relay_Log_Pos: 950
      Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000004
           Slave_IO_Running: Yes
          Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
            Replicate_Do_DB: 
        Replicate_Ignore_DB: 
         Replicate_Do_Table: 
     Replicate_Ignore_Table: 
    Replicate_Wild_Do_Table: 
Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: 
                 Last_Errno: 0
                 Last_Error: 
               Skip_Counter: 0
        Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 931
            Relay_Log_Space: 1365
            Until_Condition: None
             Until_Log_File: 
              Until_Log_Pos: 0
         Master_SSL_Allowed: No
         Master_SSL_CA_File: 
         Master_SSL_CA_Path: 
            Master_SSL_Cert: 
          Master_SSL_Cipher: 
             Master_SSL_Key: 
      Seconds_Behind_Master: 0
1 row in set (0.01 sec)

mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST \G;
*************************** 4. row ***************************
     Id: 10
   User: root
   Host: slave1:58371
     db: NULL
Command: Binlog Dump
   Time: 777
  State: Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to be updated
   Info: NULL

mysql> SHOW SLAVE HOSTS;
+-----------+--------+------+-------------------+-----------+
| Server_id | Host   | Port | Rpl_recovery_rank | Master_id |
+-----------+--------+------+-------------------+-----------+
|        10 | slave1 | 3306 |                 0 |         1 | 
+-----------+--------+------+-------------------+-----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> STOP SLAVE;

mysql> STOP SLAVE IO_THREAD;

mysql> START SLAVE;

You can use replication as a backup solution by replicating data from the master to a slave, and then backing up the data slave. Because the slave can be paused and shut down without affecting the running operation of the master you can produce an effective snapshot of 'live' data that would otherwise require a shutdown of the master database.

How you back up the database will depend on the size of the database and whether you are backing up only the data, or the data and the replication slave state so that you can rebuild the slave in the event of failure. There are therefore two choices:

If you are using replication as a solution to enable you to back up the data on the master, and the size of your database is not too large, then the mysqldump tool may be suitable. See Section 18.2.1.1, “Backing Up a Slave Using mysqldump”.

For larger databases, where mysqldump would be impractical or inefficient, you can back up the raw data files instead. Using the raw data files option also means that you can back up the binary and relay logs that will enable you to recreate the slave in the event of a slave failure. For more information, see Section 18.2.1.2, “Backing Up Raw Data from a Slave”.

The replication process does not care if the source table on the master and the replicated table on the slave use different engine types. In fact, the system variables storage_engine and table_type are not replicated.

This provides a number of advantages in the replication process in that you can take advantage of different engine types for different replication scenarios. For example, in a typical scaleout scenario (see Section 18.2.3, “Using Replication for Scale-Out”), you want to use InnoDB tables on the master to take advantage of the transactional functionality, but use MyISAM on the slaves where transaction support is not required because the data is only read. When using replication in a data logging environment you may want to use the Archive storage engine on the slave.

Setting up different engines on the master and slave depends on how you set up the initial replication process:

If you are already running a replication solution and want to convert your existing tables to another engine type, follow these steps:

Although the storage_engine and table_type variables are not replicated, be aware that CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE statements that include the engine specification will be correctly replicated to the slave. For example, if you have a CSV table and you execute:

mysql> ALTER TABLE csvtable Engine='MyISAM';

The above statement will be replicated to the slave and the engine type on the slave will be converted to MyISAM, even if you have previously changed the table type on the slave to an engine other than CSV. If you want to retain engine differences on the master and slave, you should be careful to use the storage_engine variable on the master when creating a new table. For example, instead of:

mysql> CREATE TABLE tablea (columna int) Engine=MyISAM;

Use this format:

mysql> SET storage_engine=MyISAM;
mysql> CREATE TABLE tablea (columna int);

When replicated, the storage_engine variable will be ignored, and the CREATE TABLE statement will be executed with the slave's default engine type.

You can use replication as a scale-out solution, i.e. where you want to split up the load of database queries across multiple database servers, within some reasonable limitations.

Because replication works from the distribution of one master to one or more slaves, using replication for scaleout works best in an environment where you have a high number of reads and low number of writes/updates. Most websites fit into this category, where users are browsing the website, reading articles, posts, or viewing products. Updates only occur during session management, or when making a purchase or adding a comment/message to a forum.

Replication in this situation enables you to distribute the reads over the replication slaves, while still allowing your web servers to communicate with the replication master when a write is required. You can see a sample replication layout for this scenario in Figure 18.1, “Using replication to improve the performance during scaleout”.

Figure 18.1. Using replication to improve the performance during scaleout

If the part of your code that is responsible for database access has been properly abstracted/modularized, converting it to run with a replicated setup should be very smooth and easy. Change the implementation of your database access to send all writes to the master, and to send reads to either the master or a slave. If your code does not have this level of abstraction, setting up a replicated system gives you the opportunity and motivation to clean it up. Start by creating a wrapper library or module that implements the following functions:

safe_ in each function name means that the function takes care of handling all error conditions. You can use different names for the functions. The important thing is to have a unified interface for connecting for reads, connecting for writes, doing a read, and doing a write.

Then convert your client code to use the wrapper library. This may be a painful and scary process at first, but it pays off in the long run. All applications that use the approach just described are able to take advantage of a master/slave configuration, even one involving multiple slaves. The code is much easier to maintain, and adding troubleshooting options is trivial. You need modify only one or two functions; for example, to log how long each statement took, or which statement among those issued gave you an error.

If you have written a lot of code, you may want to automate the conversion task by using the replace utility that comes with standard MySQL distributions, or write your own conversion script. Ideally, your code uses consistent programming style conventions. If not, then you are probably better off rewriting it anyway, or at least going through and manually regularizing it to use a consistent style.

There may be situations where you have a single master and want to replicate different databases to different slaves. For example, you may want to distribute different sales data to different departments to help spread the load during data analysis. A sample of this layout is shown in Figure 18.2, “Using replication to replicate separate DBs to multiple hosts”.

Figure 18.2. Using replication to replicate separate DBs to multiple hosts

You can achieve this separation by configuring the master and slaves as normal, and then limiting the binary log statements that each slave processes by using the replicate-wild-do-table configuration option on each slave.

For example, to support the separation as shown in Figure 18.2, “Using replication to replicate separate DBs to multiple hosts”, you would configure each slave as follows before enabling replication using START SLAVE:

If you have data that needs to be synchronized to the slaves before replication starts, you have a number of options:

Each slave in this configuration will transfer to the entire binary log from the master, but will only execute the events within the binary log that apply to the configured databases and tables.

As the number of slaves connecting to a master increases, the load, although minimal, also increases, as each slave uses up a client connection to the master. Also, as each slave must receive a full copy of the master binary log, the network load on the master may also increase and start to create a bottleneck.

If you are using a large number of slaves connected to one master, and that master is also busy processing requests (for example, as part of a scaleout solution), then you may want to improve the performance of the replication process.

One way to improve the performance of the replication process is to create a deeper replication structure that enables the master to replicate to only one slave, and for the remaining slaves to connect to this primary slave for their individual replication requirements. A sample of this structure is shown in Figure 18.3, “Using an additional replication host to improve performance”.

Figure 18.3. Using an additional replication host to improve performance

For this to work, you must configure the MySQL instances as follows:

The above solution reduces the client load and the network interface load on the primary master, which should improve the overall performance of the primary master when used as a direct database solution.

If your slaves are having trouble keeping up with the replication process on the master then there are a number of options available:

There is currently no official solution for providing failover between master and slaves in the event of a failure. With the currently available features, you would have to set up a master and a slave (or several slaves), and to write a script that monitors the master to check whether it is up. Then instruct your applications and the slaves to change master in case of failure.

Remember that you can tell a slave to change its master at any time, using the CHANGE MASTER TO statement. The slave will not check whether the databases on the master are compatible with the slave, it will just start executing events from the specified log and postition on the new master. In a failover situation all the servers in the group are probably executing the same events from the same binary log, so changing the source of the events should not affect the database structure or integrity providing you are careful.

Run your slaves with the --log-bin option and without --log-slave-updates. In this way, the slave is ready to become a master as soon as you issue STOP SLAVE; RESET MASTER, and CHANGE MASTER TO statement on the other slaves. For example, assume that you have the structure shown in Figure 18.4, “Redundancy using replication, initial structure”.

Figure 18.4. Redundancy using replication, initial structure

In this diagram, the MySQL Master holds the master database, the MySQL Slave computers are replication slaves, and the Web Client machines are issuing database reads and writes. Web clients that issue only reads (and would normally be connected to the slaves) are not shown, as they do not need to switch to a new server in the event of failure. For a more detailed example of a read/write scaleout replication structure, see Section 18.2.3, “Using Replication for Scale-Out”.

Each MySQL Slave (Slave 1, Slave 2, and Slave 3) are slaves running with --log-bin and without --log-slave-updates. Because updates received by a slave from the master are not logged in the binary log unless --log-slave-updates is specified, the binary log on each slave is empty initially. If for some reason MySQL Master becomes unavailable, you can pick one of the slaves to become the new master. For example, if you pick Slave 1, all Web Clients should be redirected to Slave 1, which will log updates to its binary log. Slave 2 and Slave 3 should then replicate from Slave 1.

The reason for running the slave without --log-slave-updates is to prevent slaves from receiving updates twice in case you cause one of the slaves to become the new master. Suppose that Slave 1 has --log-slave-updates enabled. Then it will write updates that it receives from Master to its own binary log. When Slave 2 changes from Master to Slave 1 as its master, it may receive updates from Slave 1 that it has already received from Master

Make sure that all slaves have processed any statements in their relay log. On each slave, issue STOP SLAVE IO_THREAD, then check the output of SHOW PROCESSLIST until you see Has read all relay log. When this is true for all slaves, they can be reconfigured to the new setup. On the slave Slave 1 being promoted to become the master, issue STOP SLAVE and RESET MASTER.

On the other slaves Slave 2 and Slave 3, use STOP SLAVE and CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_HOST='Slave1' (where 'Slave1' represents the real hostname of Slave 1). To CHANGE MASTER, add all information about how to connect to Slave 1 from Slave 2 or Slave 3 (user, password, port). In CHANGE MASTER, there is no need to specify the name of Slave 1's binary log or binary log position to read from: We know it is the first binary log and position 4, which are the defaults for CHANGE MASTER. Finally, use START SLAVE on Slave 2 and Slave 3.

Once the new replication is in place, you will then need to instruct each Web Client to direct their statements to Slave 1. From that point on, all updates statements sent by Web Client to Slave 1 are written to the binary log of Slave 1, which then contains every update statement sent to Slave 1 since Master died.

The resulting server structure is shown in Figure 18.5, “Redundancy using replication, after master failure”.

Figure 18.5. Redundancy using replication, after master failure

When Master is up again, you must issue on it the same CHANGE MASTER as that issued on Slave 2 and Slave 3, so that Master becomes a slave of S1 and picks up each Web Client writes that it missed while it was down.

To make Master a master again (because it is the most powerful machine, for example), use the preceding procedure as if Slave 1 was unavailable and Master was to be the new master. During this procedure, do not forget to run RESET MASTER on Master before making Slave 1, Slave 2, and Slave 3 slaves of Master. Otherwise, they may pick up old Web Client writes from before the point at which Master became unavailable.

Note that there is no synchronization between the different slaves to a master. Some slaves might be ahead of others. This means that the concept outlined in the previous example might not work. In practice, however, the relay logs of different slaves will most likely not be far behind the master, so it would work, anyway (but there is no guarantee).

A good way to keep your applications informed as to the location of the master is by having a dynamic DNS entry for the master. With bind you can use nsupdate to dynamically update your DNS.

Setting up replication using an SSL connection is similar to setting up a server and client using SSL. You will need to obtain (or create) a suitable security certificate that you can use on the master, and a similar certificate (from the same certificate authority) on each slave.

To use SSL for encrypting the transfer of the binary log required during replication you must first set up the master to support SSL network connections. If the master does not support SSL connections (because it has not been compiled or configured for SSL), then replication through an SSL connection will not be possible.

For more information on setting up a server and client for SSL connectivity, see Section 5.5.7.2, “Using SSL Connections”.

To enable SSL on the master you will need to create or obtain suitable certficates and then add the following configuration options to the master's configuration within the mysqld section:

ssl-ca=cacert.pem
ssl-cert=server-cert.pem
ssl-key=server-key.pem

The options are as follows:

On the slave, you have two options available for setting the SSL information. You can either add the slaves certificates to the client section of the slave configuration file, or you can explicitly specify the SSL information using the CHANGE MASTER statement.

Using the former option, add the following lines to the client section of the slave configuration file:

[client]
ssl-ca=cacert.pem
ssl-cert=server-cert.pem
ssl-key=server-key.pem

Restart the slave server, using the --skip-slave to prevent the slave from connecting to the master. Use CHANGE MASTER to specify the master configuration, using the master_ssl option to enable SSL connectivity:

mysql> CHANGE MASTER TO \
    MASTER_HOST='master_hostname', \
    MASTER_USER='replicate', \
    MASTER_PASSWORD='password', \
    MASTER_SSL=1;

To specify the SSL certificate options during the CHANGE MASTER command, append the SSL options:

CHANGE MASTER TO \
      MASTER_HOST='master_hostname', \
      MASTER_USER='replicate', \
      MASTER_PASSWORD='password', \
      MASTER_SSL=1, \
      MASTER_SSL_CA = 'ca_file_name', \
      MASTER_SSL_CAPATH = 'ca_directory_name', \
      MASTER_SSL_CERT = 'cert_file_name', \
      MASTER_SSL_KEY = 'key_file_name';

Once the master information has been updated, start the slave replication process:

mysql> START SLAVE;

You can use the SHOW SLAVE STATUS to confirm that SSL connection has been completed.

For more information on the CHANGE MASTER TO syntax, see Section 12.6.2.1, “CHANGE MASTER TO Syntax”.

If you want to enforce SSL connections to be used during replication, then create a user with the REPLICATION SLAVE privilege and use the REQUIRE_SSL option for that user. For example:

mysql> GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE ON *.*
    -> TO 'repl'@'%.mydomain.com' IDENTIFIED BY 'slavepass' REQUIRE SSL;

In general, replication compatibility at the SQL level requires that any features used be supported by both the master and the slave servers. If you use a feature on a master server that is available only as of a given version of MySQL, you cannot replicate to a slave that is older than that version. Such incompatibilities are likely to occur between series, so that, for example, you cannot replicate from MySQL 5.0 to 4.1. However, these incompatibilities also can occur for within-series replication. For example, the SLEEP() function is available in MySQL 5.0.12 and up. If you use this function on the master server, you cannot replicate to a slave server that is older than MySQL 5.0.12.

If you are planning to use replication between 5.0 and a previous version of MySQL you should consult the edition of the MySQL Reference Manual corresponding to the earlier release series for information regarding the replication characteristics of that series.

The following sections provide details about what is supported and what is not. Additional information specific to InnoDB and replication is given in Section 13.2.6.5, “InnoDB and MySQL Replication”.

Replication issues with regard to stored routines and triggers is described in Section 21.4, “Binary Logging of Stored Routines and Triggers”.

INSERT INTO t VALUES(UUID());

SET @my_uuid = UUID();
INSERT INTO t VALUES(@my_uuid);

SET @my_uuid1 = UUID(); @my_uuid2 = UUID();
INSERT INTO t VALUES(@my_uuid1),(@my_uuid2);

INSERT INTO t2 SELECT UUID(), * FROM t1;

          
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS FROM mytable LIMIT 1;
INSERT INTO mytable VALUES( FOUND_ROWS() );

          
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS INTO @found_rows FROM mytable LIMIT 1;
INSERT INTO mytable VALUES(@found_rows);

CREATE /*!50017 DEFINER = 'root'@'localhost' */ TRIGGER ... ;

The binary log format as implemented in MySQL 5.0 is considerably different from that used in previous versions. Major changes were made in MySQL 5.0.3 (for improvements to handling of character sets and LOAD DATA INFILE) and 5.0.4 (for improvements to handling of time zones).

We recommend using the most recent MySQL version available because replication capabilities are continually being improved. We also recommend using the same version for both the master and the slave. We recommend upgrading masters and slaves running alpha or beta versions to new (production) versions. Replication from a 5.0.3 master to a 5.0.2 slave will fail; from a 5.0.4 master to a 5.0.3 slave will also fail.

In general (but not always), slaves running MySQL 5.0.x may be used with older masters, but not the reverse. For more information on potential issues, see Section 18.3.1, “Replication Features and Issues”.

The preceding information pertains to replication compatibility at the protocol level. However, there can be other constraints, such as SQL-level compatibility issues. For example, a 5.0 master cannot replicate to a 4.1 slave if the replicated statements use SQL features available in 5.0 but not in 4.1. These and other issues are discussed in Section 18.3.1, “Replication Features and Issues”.

When you upgrade servers that participate in a replication setup, the procedure for upgrading depends on the current server versions and the version to which you are upgrading.

This section applies to upgrading replication from MySQL 3.23, 4.0, or 4.1 to MySQL 5.0. A 4.0 server should be 4.0.3 or newer.

When you upgrade a master to 5.0 from an earlier MySQL release series, you should first ensure that all the slaves of this master are using the same 5.0.x release. If this is not the case, you should first upgrade the slaves. To upgrade each slave, shut it down, upgrade it to the appropriate 5.0.x version, restart it, and restart replication. The 5.0 slave is able to read the old relay logs written prior to the upgrade and to execute the statements they contain. Relay logs created by the slave after the upgrade are in 5.0 format.

After the slaves have been upgraded, shut down the master, upgrade it to the same 5.0.x release as the slaves, and restart it. The 5.0 master is able to read the old binary logs written prior to the upgrade and to send them to the 5.0 slaves. The slaves recognize the old format and handle it properly. Binary logs created by the master following the upgrade are in 5.0 format. These too are recognized by the 5.0 slaves.

In other words, there are no measures to take when upgrading to MySQL 5.0, except that the slaves must be MySQL 5.0 before you can upgrade the master to 5.0. Note that downgrading from 5.0 to older versions does not work so simply: You must ensure that any 5.0 binary logs or relay logs have been fully processed, so that you can remove them before proceeding with the downgrade.

Questions

Questions and Answers

19.3.4.1: How do I configure a slave if the master is running and I do not want to stop it?

There are several possibilities. If you have taken a snapshot backup of the master at some point and recorded the binary log filename and offset (from the output of SHOW MASTER STATUS) corresponding to the snapshot, use the following procedure:

If you do not have a backup of the master server, here is a quick procedure for creating one. All steps should be performed on the master host.

An alternative to using the preceding procedure to make a binary copy is to make an SQL dump of the master. To do this, you can use mysqldump --master-data on your master and later load the SQL dump into your slave. However, this is slower than making a binary copy.

Regardless of which of the two methods you use, afterward follow the instructions for the case when you have a snapshot and have recorded the log filename and offset. You can use the same snapshot to set up several slaves. Once you have the snapshot of the master, you can wait to set up a slave as long as the binary logs of the master are left intact. The two practical limitations on the length of time you can wait are the amount of disk space available to retain binary logs on the master and the length of time it takes the slave to catch up.

19.3.4.2: Does the slave need to be connected to the master all the time?

No, it does not. The slave can go down or stay disconnected for hours or even days, and then reconnect and catch up on updates. For example, you can set up a master/slave relationship over a dial-up link where the link is up only sporadically and for short periods of time. The implication of this is that, at any given time, the slave is not guaranteed to be in synchrony with the master unless you take some special measures.

19.3.4.3: How do I know how late a slave is compared to the master? In other words, how do I know the date of the last statement replicated by the slave?

You can read the Seconds_Behind_Master column in SHOW SLAVE STATUS. See Section 18.4.1, “Replication Implementation Details”.

When the slave SQL thread executes an event read from the master, it modifies its own time to the event timestamp. (This is why TIMESTAMP is well replicated.) In the Time column in the output of SHOW PROCESSLIST, the number of seconds displayed for the slave SQL thread is the number of seconds between the timestamp of the last replicated event and the real time of the slave machine. You can use this to determine the date of the last replicated event. Note that if your slave has been disconnected from the master for one hour, and then reconnects, you may immediately see Time values like 3600 for the slave SQL thread in SHOW PROCESSLIST. This is because the slave is executing statements that are one hour old.

19.3.4.4: How do I force the master to block updates until the slave catches up?

Use the following procedure:

19.3.4.5: What issues should I be aware of when setting up two-way replication?

MySQL replication currently does not support any locking protocol between master and slave to guarantee the atomicity of a distributed (cross-server) update. In other words, it is possible for client A to make an update to co-master 1, and in the meantime, before it propagates to co-master 2, client B could make an update to co-master 2 that makes the update of client A work differently than it did on co-master 1. Thus, when the update of client A makes it to co-master 2, it produces tables that are different from what you have on co-master 1, even after all the updates from co-master 2 have also propagated. This means that you should not chain two servers together in a two-way replication relationship unless you are sure that your updates can safely happen in any order, or unless you take care of mis-ordered updates somehow in the client code.

You should also realize that two-way replication actually does not improve performance very much (if at all) as far as updates are concerned. Each server must do the same number of updates, just as you would have a single server do. The only difference is that there is a little less lock contention, because the updates originating on another server are serialized in one slave thread. Even this benefit might be offset by network delays.

19.3.4.6: How can I use replication to improve performance of my system?

You should set up one server as the master and direct all writes to it. Then configure as many slaves as you have the budget and rackspace for, and distribute the reads among the master and the slaves. You can also start the slaves with the --skip-innodb, --skip-bdb, --low-priority-updates, and --delay-key-write=ALL options to get speed improvements on the slave end. In this case, the slave uses non-transactional MyISAM tables instead of InnoDB and BDB tables to get more speed by eliminating transactional overhead.

19.3.4.7: What should I do to prepare client code in my own applications to use performance-enhancing replication?

If the part of your code that is responsible for database access has been properly abstracted/modularized, converting it to run with a replicated setup should be very smooth and easy. Change the implementation of your database access to send all writes to the master, and to send reads to either the master or a slave. If your code does not have this level of abstraction, setting up a replicated system gives you the opportunity and motivation to it clean up. Start by creating a wrapper library or module that implements the following functions:

safe_ in each function name means that the function takes care of handling all error conditions. You can use different names for the functions. The important thing is to have a unified interface for connecting for reads, connecting for writes, doing a read, and doing a write.

Then convert your client code to use the wrapper library. This may be a painful and scary process at first, but it pays off in the long run. All applications that use the approach just described are able to take advantage of a master/slave configuration, even one involving multiple slaves. The code is much easier to maintain, and adding troubleshooting options is trivial. You need modify only one or two functions; for example, to log how long each statement took, or which statement among those issued gave you an error.

If you have written a lot of code, you may want to automate the conversion task by using the replace utility that comes with standard MySQL distributions, or write your own conversion script. Ideally, your code uses consistent programming style conventions. If not, then you are probably better off rewriting it anyway, or at least going through and manually regularizing it to use a consistent style.

19.3.4.8: When and how much can MySQL replication improve the performance of my system?

MySQL replication is most beneficial for a system that processes frequent reads and infrequent writes. In theory, by using a single-master/multiple-slave setup, you can scale the system by adding more slaves until you either run out of network bandwidth, or your update load grows to the point that the master cannot handle it.

To determine how many slaves you can use before the added benefits begin to level out, and how much you can improve performance of your site, you need to know your query patterns, and to determine empirically by benchmarking the relationship between the throughput for reads (reads per second, or reads) and for writes (writes) on a typical master and a typical slave. The example here shows a rather simplified calculation of what you can get with replication for a hypothetical system.

Let's say that system load consists of 10% writes and 90% reads, and we have determined by benchmarking that reads is 1200 – 2 × writes. In other words, the system can do 1,200 reads per second with no writes, the average write is twice as slow as the average read, and the relationship is linear. Let us suppose that the master and each slave have the same capacity, and that we have one master and N slaves. Then we have for each server (master or slave):

reads = 1200 – 2 × writes

reads = 9 × writes / (N + 1) (reads are split, but writes go to all servers)

9 × writes / (N + 1) + 2 × writes = 1200

writes = 1200 / (2 + 9/(N+1))

The last equation indicates the maximum number of writes for N slaves, given a maximum possible read rate of 1,200 per minute and a ratio of nine reads per write.

This analysis yields the following conclusions:

Note that these computations assume infinite network bandwidth and neglect several other factors that could be significant on your system. In many cases, you may not be able to perform a computation similar to the one just shown that accurately predicts what will happen on your system if you add N replication slaves. However, answering the following questions should help you decide whether and by how much replication will improve the performance of your system:

19.3.4.9: How do I prevent GRANT and REVOKE statements from replicating to slave machines?

Start the server with the --replicate-wild-ignore-table=mysql.% option.

19.3.4.10: Does replication work on mixed operating systems (for example, the master runs on Linux while slaves run on Mac OS X and Windows)?

Yes.

19.3.4.11: Does replication work on mixed hardware architectures (for example, the master runs on a 64-bit machine while slaves run on 32-bit machines)?

Yes.

If you have followed the instructions, and your replication setup is not working, the first thing to do is check the error log for messages. Many users have lost time by not doing this soon enough after encountering problems.

If you cannot tell from the error log what the problem was, try the following techniques:

When you have determined that there is no user error involved, and replication still either does not work at all or is unstable, it is time to send us a bug report. We need to obtain as much information as possible from you to be able to track down the bug. Please spend some time and effort in preparing a good bug report.

If you have a repeatable test case that demonstrates the bug, please enter it into our bugs database using the instructions given in Section 1.7, “How to Report Bugs or Problems”. If you have a “phantom” problem (one that you cannot duplicate at will), use the following procedure:

After you have collected the evidence for the problem, try to isolate it as a separate test case first. Then enter the problem with as much information as possible into our bugs database using the instructions at Section 1.7, “How to Report Bugs or Problems”.

MySQL replication capabilities are implemented using three threads (one on the master server and two on the slave). When a START SLAVE statement is issued on a slave server, the slave creates an I/O thread, which connects to the master and asks it to send the updates recorded in its binary logs. The master creates a thread to send the binary log contents to the slave. This thread can be identified as the Binlog Dump thread in the output of SHOW PROCESSLIST on the master. The slave I/O thread reads the updates that the master Binlog Dump thread sends and copies them to local files, known as relay logs, in the slave's data directory. The third thread is the SQL thread, which the slave creates to read the relay logs and to execute the updates they contain.

MySQL Enterprise For constant monitoring of the status of slaves subscribe to the MySQL Enterprise Monitor. For more information, see http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/advisors.html.

In the preceding description, there are three threads per master/slave connection. A master that has multiple slaves creates one thread for each currently-connected slave, and each slave has its own I/O and SQL threads.

The slave uses two threads so that reading updates from the master and executing them can be separated into two independent tasks. Thus, the task of reading statements is not slowed down if statement execution is slow. For example, if the slave server has not been running for a while, its I/O thread can quickly fetch all the binary log contents from the master when the slave starts, even if the SQL thread lags far behind. If the slave stops before the SQL thread has executed all the fetched statements, the I/O thread has at least fetched everything so that a safe copy of the statements is stored locally in the slave's relay logs, ready for execution the next time that the slave starts. This enables the master server to purge its binary logs sooner because it no longer needs to wait for the slave to fetch their contents.

The SHOW PROCESSLIST statement provides information that tells you what is happening on the master and on the slave regarding replication. See Section 7.5.5, “Examining Thread Information”, for descriptions of all replicated-related states.

The following example illustrates how the three threads show up in the output from SHOW PROCESSLIST.

On the master server, the output from SHOW PROCESSLIST looks like this:

mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
     Id: 2
   User: root
   Host: localhost:32931
     db: NULL
Command: Binlog Dump
   Time: 94
  State: Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to
         be updated
   Info: NULL

Here, thread 2 is a Binlog Dump replication thread for a connected slave. The State information indicates that all outstanding updates have been sent to the slave and that the master is waiting for more updates to occur. If you see no Binlog Dump threads on a master server, this means that replication is not running — that is, that no slaves are currently connected.

On the slave server, the output from SHOW PROCESSLIST looks like this:

mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
     Id: 10
   User: system user
   Host:
     db: NULL
Command: Connect
   Time: 11
  State: Waiting for master to send event
   Info: NULL
*************************** 2. row ***************************
     Id: 11
   User: system user
   Host:
     db: NULL
Command: Connect
   Time: 11
  State: Has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O
         thread to update it
   Info: NULL

This information indicates that thread 10 is the I/O thread that is communicating with the master server, and thread 11 is the SQL thread that is processing the updates stored in the relay logs. At the time that the SHOW PROCESSLIST was run, both threads were idle, waiting for further updates.

The value in the Time column can show how late the slave is compared to the master. See Section 18.3.4, “Replication FAQ”.

By default, relay logs filenames have the form host_name-relay-bin.nnnnnn, where host_name is the name of the slave server host and nnnnnn is a sequence number. Successive relay log files are created using successive sequence numbers, beginning with 000001. The slave uses an index file to track the relay log files currently in use. The default relay log index filename is host_name-relay-bin.index. By default, the slave server creates relay log files in its data directory.

The default filenames for relay logs and relay log index files can be overridden with, respectively, the --relay-log and --relay-log-index server options (see Section 18.1.2, “Replication Startup Options and Variables”). For this reason, changing a replication slave's hostname can cause replication to fail with the errors Failed to open the relay log and Could not find target log during relay log initialization. This is a known issue which we intend to fix in a future MySQL release (see Bug#2122). If you anticipate that a slave's hostname may change in the future (for example, if networking is set up on the slave such that its hostname can be modified via DHCP), then you can use these options to prevent this problem from occurring. However, if you encounter this issue, one way to work around it is to stop the slave server, prepend the contents of the old relay log index file to the new one, then restart the slave. On a Unix system, this can be done as shown here, where new_host_name is the new hostname and old_host_name is the old one:

shell< cat new_host_name-relay-bin.index >> old_host_name-relay-bin.index

shell< mv old_host_name-relay-bin.index new_host_name-relay-bin.index

Relay logs have the same format as binary logs and can be read using mysqlbinlog. The SQL thread automatically deletes each relay log file as soon as it has executed all events in the file and no longer needs it. There is no explicit mechanism for deleting relay logs because the SQL thread takes care of doing so. However, FLUSH LOGS rotates relay logs, which influences when the SQL thread deletes them.

A slave server creates a new relay log file under the following conditions:

A slave replication server creates two additional small files in the data directory. These status files are named master.info and relay-log.info by default. Their names can be changed by using the --master-info-file and --relay-log-info-file options. See Section 18.1.2, “Replication Startup Options and Variables”.

The two status files contain information like that shown in the output of the SHOW SLAVE STATUS statement, which is discussed in Section 12.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”. Because the status files are stored on disk, they survive a slave server's shutdown. The next time the slave starts up, it reads the two files to determine how far it has proceeded in reading binary logs from the master and in processing its own relay logs.

The I/O thread updates the master.info file. The following table shows the correspondence between the lines in the file and the columns displayed by SHOW SLAVE STATUS.

The SQL thread updates the relay-log.info file. The following table shows the correspondence between the lines in the file and the columns displayed by SHOW SLAVE STATUS.

The contents of the relay-log.info file and the states shown by the SHOW SLAVE STATES command may not match if the relay-log.info file has not been flushed to disk. Ideally, you should only view relay-log.info on a slave that is offline (i.e. mysqld is not running). For a running system, SHOW SLAVE STATUS should be used.

When you back up the slave's data, you should back up these two status files as well, along with the relay log files. They are needed to resume replication after you restore the slave's data. If you lose the relay logs but still have the relay-log.info file, you can check it to determine how far the SQL thread has executed in the master binary logs. Then you can use CHANGE MASTER TO with the MASTER_LOG_FILE and MASTER_LOG_POS options to tell the slave to re-read the binary logs from that point. Of course, this requires that the binary logs still exist on the master server.

If your slave is subject to replicating LOAD DATA INFILE statements, you should also back up any SQL_LOAD-* files that exist in the directory that the slave uses for this purpose. The slave needs these files to resume replication of any interrupted LOAD DATA INFILE operations. The directory location is specified using the --slave-load-tmpdir option. If this option is not specified, the directory location is the value of the tmpdir system variable.

If a master server does not write a statement to its binary log, the statement is not replicated. If the server does log the statement, the statement is sent to all slaves and each slave determines whether to execute it or ignore it.

On the master side, decisions about which statements to log are based on the --binlog-do-db and --binlog-ignore-db options that control binary logging. For a description of the rules that servers use in evaluating these options, see Section 5.2.3, “The Binary Log”.

On the slave side, decisions about whether to execute or ignore statements received from the master are made according to the --replicate-* options that the slave was started with. (See Section 18.1.2, “Replication Startup Options and Variables”.) The slave evaluates these options using the following procedure, which first checks the database-level options and then the table-level options.

In the simplest case, when there are no --replicate-* options, the procedure yields the result that the slave executes all statements that it receives from the master. Otherwise, the result depends on the particular options given. In general, to make it easier to determine what effect an option set will have, it is recommended that you avoid mixing “do” and “ignore” options, or wildcard and non-wildcard options.

Stage 1. Check the database options.

At this stage, the slave checks whether there are any --replicate-do-db or --replicate-ignore-db options that specify database-specific conditions:

This stage can permit a statement for further option-checking, or cause it to be ignored. However, statements that are permitted at this stage are not actually executed yet. Instead, they pass to the following stage that checks the table options.

Stage 2. Check the table options.

First, as a preliminary condition, the slave checks whether the statement occurs within a stored function or (prior to MySQL 5.0.12) a stored procedure. If so, execute the statement and exit. (Stored procedures are exempt from this test as of MySQL 5.0.12 because procedure logging occurs at the level of statements that are executed within the routine rather than at the CALL level.)

Next, the slave checks for table options and evaluates them. If the server reaches this point, it executes all statements if there are no table options. If there are “do” table options, the statement must match one of them if it is to be executed; otherwise, it is ignored. If there are any “ignore” options, all statements are executed except those that match any ignore option. The following steps describe how this evaluation occurs in more detail.

Examples: